SKUtrak

Fixing on-shelf availability, together

Man with thirst to alcohol taking beer from the shelves with strong drinks in the supermarket

Ian Hall, COO

Punishing retail suppliers for poor service levels is a lazy approach. We need a new focus on fixing on-shelf availability. As a former Tesco buyer, I often reprimanded suppliers for short deliveries. It didn’t achieve a lot. Buyers read reports indicating missed deliveries, react by making phone calls, and may even threaten fines. This approach is lazy but also misses the point; suppliers want to sell products too.

The shared goal here is to maximise product availability, and that means ensuring that products are on the shelf when shoppers want to buy them. But effective management of your ‘flow-of-goods’ from the production line to the consumer is much more nuanced than simply asking, ‘Did I deliver what my retailer customer ordered last month?’.

Yet, most suppliers still focus on supplier-to-retailer service level. While it might make for a nice KPI report, it does not fix the problem of gaps on shelves.

Relying on supplier-to-depot metrics does not fix the product availability problem

Given the volume of product lines – between 200 to 700 – that a retail planner handles weekly, it’s challenging to scrutinise individual forecasts. Yet, when we shared our availability data and suggested improvements, we found that they began dedicating more time to review our product lines’ forecasts.

Jimmy Coulson, Head of Supply Chain at Yoplait UK

Depot-to-store level is a more helpful measure because it better predicts product availability

The ‘depot to store’ service level is a key metric because it more closely mirrors shelf availability and, as a result, better indicates the potential for lost sales of your products. But, many suppliers overlook this measure or wrongly believe they can’t influence it. I’ve heard some say, “Depot-to-store service is the retailer’s responsibility” – a serious misconception; this assumes that retailers have highly sophisticated, infallible systems that generate perfect forecasts. This is not the case in many instances.

A supplier’s responsibility doesn’t end once stock is delivered to the depot. Assuming that retailers manage all inventory flawlessly, with special consideration of your products, is a huge mistake. In reality, retail supply-chain managers are often tasked with overseeing thousands of products across multiple depots, translating to a daily monitoring task of tens of thousands of items.

Retailers are pragmatic and will focus on major volume lines and promotional items, or address issues with products already out of stock;  a reactive approach.

Also, many suppliers still rely on aggregated (e.g., weekly or monthly) reports or averages across many products – “My depot-to-store service level was 98% last month.” While that sounds impressive, it lacks actionable insight. Remember the cautionary tale of the statistician who drowned while crossing a river because “it was 3 feet deep on average”!

The situation is more complex – effective management requires measuring , understanding and acting on demand at an SKU/depot level daily, armed with accurate forecasts of ideal stock levels. This level of detail informs proactive actions and drives improvement.

Why should you focus on demand insights at the SKU/depot level?

How?

Collaborative partnerships, stronger results

Focusing on depot-to-store service levels fosters genuine collaboration, and it helps:


Exit mobile version